Top 10 IP Challenges for AI Companies in 2024
Discover the top IP challenges AI companies face in 2024, from inventorship to global enforcement, and how to navigate them effectively.
Save 90% on your legal bills

AI companies face major IP hurdles in 2024. Here's what you need to know:
- AI inventorship: Can AI be an inventor? Not yet, says US law.
- AI-created content protection: No copyright for AI-only works.
- Data ownership issues: Who owns AI training data? It's complicated.
- Patenting AI algorithms: Tough to patent, seen as abstract ideas.
- AI model trade secrets: Balancing protection and transparency.
- Global IP enforcement: Different countries, different rules.
- Open source AI and IP: Free doesn't mean no strings attached.
- Finding IP violations with AI: AI tools can help, but aren't perfect.
- Ethics in AI IP: Doing what's right, not just what's legal.
- Keeping up with AI progress: Laws lag behind tech advances.
Key takeaways:
- Only humans can be inventors or copyright holders
- Clear data use agreements are crucial
- Patent laws struggle with AI inventions
- Global IP protection is a mess
- Ethics matter in AI development
What should AI companies do?
- Check IP regularly
- Keep detailed records
- Set clear AI usage rules
- Stay updated on changing laws
Challenge | Main Issue | Solution |
---|---|---|
AI Inventorship | AI can't be an inventor | Document human contributions |
Content Protection | No copyright for AI-only works | Add human creativity |
Data Ownership | Unclear data rights | Use data agreements |
AI Patents | Hard to patent algorithms | Show real-world impact |
Trade Secrets | Protecting while sharing | Use careful licensing |
Bottom line: AI companies must balance innovation with legal compliance in a rapidly changing field.
Related video from YouTube
AI Inventorship
Can AI be an inventor? Not yet, according to the U.S. Federal Circuit in 2022. They rejected Stephen Thaler's attempt to patent inventions "created" by his AI system, DABUS. Why? U.S. patent law only recognizes "natural persons" as inventors.
But AI's growing ability to generate new ideas is causing headaches for patent offices. The USPTO is now grappling with how to handle AI-assisted inventions. They're seeking public input to create clear rules for when humans can claim inventor status on AI-helped work.
Here's what we know so far:
- Humans must make a "significant contribution" to patent AI-assisted inventions
- Just giving AI a problem to solve isn't enough
- Managing an AI system doesn't automatically make you the inventor
USPTO Director Kathi Vidal says:
"The right balance must be struck between awarding patent protection to promote human ingenuity and investment for AI-assisted inventions while not unnecessarily locking up innovation for future developments."
New Guidelines
The USPTO's new guidelines for AI-assisted inventions (effective February 13, 2024) state:
- AI can't be an inventor, but humans using AI can be
- Humans must make a "significant contribution"
- Named inventors are assumed correct unless proven otherwise
These rules aren't final. The USPTO is still taking comments and may update them.
For AI companies, this means:
- Document human contributions to AI-assisted inventions
- Be prepared to explain the human role in patent applications
- Keep up with changing USPTO guidelines
Bottom line: AI is reshaping invention, but human creativity still reigns supreme in patent law.
2. AI-Created Content Protection
AI-generated content is shaking up copyright law. The U.S. Copyright Office is scrambling to keep up.
Here's the scoop:
- No copyright for AI-only works
- Human touch needed for protection
- You MUST disclose AI use
Copyright Rules for AI Works
The Copyright Office has laid down some rules:
1. Humans must be involved
AI can help, but you need to add your own creative spark. Pure AI works? No dice.
2. Partial protection is a thing
Take "Zarya of the Dawn" - its story got copyright in March 2023, but those AI images? Nope.
3. Come clean about AI use
"Copyright applicants must disclose when their work includes AI-generated material." - U.S. Copyright Office
In other words: be upfront about your AI sidekick.
4. It's a global mess
Countries are all over the place:
Country | AI Content Approach |
---|---|
UK | Computer-generated works? Sure! |
China | Some AI works get protection |
USA | No humans, no copyright |
5. Legal fireworks incoming
Big players are duking it out:
- Getty Images vs. Stability AI: Photo use showdown
- The New York Times vs. OpenAI and Microsoft: AI training data drama
These cases could flip the script on AI and IP.
For AI companies, the takeaway is simple: Keep humans in the loop and be transparent. It's your best bet in this wild west of AI copyright.
3. Data Ownership Issues
Who owns the data used to train AI models? This question has sparked legal battles and ethical debates in the AI world.
Data Use Agreements
Companies are now using data use agreements (DUAs) to address this issue. These contracts outline:
- Data ownership
- Allowed uses
- Security measures
- Consequences of violations
Real-world examples show why DUAs matter:
1. LinkedIn's Data Scraping
LinkedIn used member data to train AI without permission, upsetting many users.
Region | Included in Data Scraping |
---|---|
US & UK | Yes (by default) |
EU, EEA, Switzerland | No (due to stricter laws) |
2. Scarlett Johansson vs. OpenAI
OpenAI used Johansson's voice without consent. She fought back, forcing them to stop.
3. Flipkart's Approach
This Indian e-commerce company now gets clear consent before using customer data for AI.
"The creators of any kind of data... is owned by the creator." - John Thompson, Global Head of AI at EY
For AI companies, this means:
- Get consent first
- Create clear DUAs
- Follow local laws
- Be prepared to remove data if asked (though it's tough once an AI is trained)
4. Patenting AI Algorithms
AI companies face a challenge: protecting their algorithms through patents. The USPTO often views these inventions as abstract ideas, making them tough to patent.
New USPTO Guidelines
The USPTO has updated its rules for AI patents. Here's what's changed:
1. July 2024 Guidelines
New guidelines for AI patents, effective July 17, 2024:
- Help examiners better evaluate AI inventions
- Provide clearer patentable examples
- Seek public input for improvement
2. Key Changes
Old Approach | New Approach |
---|---|
Vague on AI | More AI-focused examples |
Limited eligibility guidance | Clearer criteria |
General tech rules | AI-specific considerations |
3. What Companies Should Do
- Show how your AI solves a real tech problem
- Explain practical uses of AI output
- Highlight improvements over older methods
"The USPTO remains committed to fostering and protecting innovation in critical and emerging technologies, including AI." - Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO
4. Real-World Impact
The new rules are changing patent approvals:
- Machine learning patent applications up 28% yearly
- More AI inventions getting patents
- Some still face challenges
A Hidden Markov Model for resolving "haplotype phase" was rejected as just better math. But a lip sync animation system was approved for improving computer animation.
5. Tips for Success
- Break down your AI algorithm into key steps
- Show its novelty and usefulness in your industry
- Explain why it's not just an abstract idea
- Use USPTO's new examples as a guide
Remember: You need a finished product or method to patent, not just an idea.
5. AI Model Trade Secrets
AI companies are in a tight spot. They need to protect their models but also be transparent. It's not easy.
Keeping Secrets While Building Trust
Trade secrets let companies guard their AI algorithms without showing everything. But they've got to work to keep those secrets under wraps.
Here's how AI firms can do both:
- Use licensing: Share some, but keep control.
- Mess up the code: Make it work, but hard to read.
- Let others check: Build trust without spilling the beans.
- Set clear rules: Protect what goes in and what comes out.
Real-world examples:
Company | What They Did | What Happened |
---|---|---|
OpenAI | GPT-3 only through API | Protected core, allowed use |
Published AI principles | More open, kept algorithms secret | |
IBM | Offered "AI FactSheets" | Gave info, hid trade secrets |
But watch out! Even the big guys mess up. In early 2023, a major tech company banned ChatGPT after employees put secret code into it.
To avoid this:
- Teach staff how to use AI tools right
- Make your own AI apps for secret stuff
- Set clear rules for using outside AI
Remember: Once a secret's out, it's out for good. Be smart and keep your edge.
sbb-itb-ea3f94f
6. Global IP Enforcement
Protecting AI tech worldwide? It's a headache. Why? Different countries, different IP laws.
International Teamwork
We need countries to sync up on AI IP rules. Right now? It's chaos.
Here's the scoop:
- WIPO's trying to help. They've kicked off a chat called "WIPO Conversation on IP and AI".
- AI's booming. In India, it could pump $900 billion into the economy by 2035. But laws? They're lagging.
- IP theft's getting worse. In 2022, stealing American IP cost 36% more than before.
What can AI companies do?
1. Plan ahead
Before teaming up with foreign companies, agree on how to handle fights.
2. Fight AI with AI
Use AI to spot fakes and pirated stuff online.
3. Speak up
Join talks about AI and IP laws. Your voice counts.
4. Do the math
If you're in a dispute, figure out if it's worth the battle.
Here's a quick breakdown:
Group | Action |
---|---|
AI Companies | Use AI for IP protection, join policy talks |
Governments | Update laws, collaborate internationally |
Lawyers | Get AI-savvy, draft clear agreements |
WIPO | Keep leading global AI and IP discussions |
7. Open Source AI and IP
Open source AI is a mixed bag for companies. It boosts innovation but can cause IP headaches.
Clear License Rules
The key? Knowing who owns what.
Here's the deal:
- Employees often think open-source means everything's free. It's not.
- There are two main license types: permissive and copyleft. Each has its own rules.
- Companies can get sued if they mess up license terms.
In 2007, a company got sued for breaking GPL rules. Yikes.
So, what can AI companies do?
1. Know your licenses
License Type | Meaning | Example |
---|---|---|
Permissive | Use freely, give credit | MIT License |
Copyleft | Share changes under same terms | GNU GPL |
2. Track everything
Keep tabs on all open-source bits in your AI. Version, license, changes - all of it.
3. Set clear rules
Tell your team what's okay and what's not with open-source AI.
4. Get it in writing
Use confidentiality agreements. Jeffrey Drake, an attorney, says:
"Using open-source software in a broader package doesn't make the whole thing unprotectable."
5. Watch for "open-washing"
Some companies claim "open source" when it's not. Don't fall for it.
6. Stay updated
Laws are changing. The EU's AI Act might shake things up.
Bottom line: Open source isn't a free-for-all. Follow the rules to avoid IP troubles.
8. Finding IP Violations with AI
AI companies face a big challenge: spotting IP theft in a sea of digital content. But AI itself might be the solution.
AI-Based IP Checking Tools
AI is changing the IP protection game:
- It slashes patent search times by 80%
- It catches unauthorized image use 85% of the time
- It monitors the web 24/7, flagging potential IP issues instantly
But it's not all smooth sailing:
Challenge | Solution |
---|---|
Proving infringement | AI-powered data source tracking |
Jurisdictional issues | International AI systems |
Balancing fair use | Context-aware AI training |
Real-world example:
Getty Images sued Stability AI in 2022. Why? Stability AI allegedly used 12 million Getty images to train their AI without permission.
This case highlights the need for caution. Using AI to check for IP violations is smart, but companies must also watch their own AI development.
What should AI companies do?
- Use AI tools to monitor their IP and others'
- Keep clear records of AI training data sources
- Stay up-to-date on IP laws across countries
Bottom line: AI is powerful, but not foolproof. Human oversight remains crucial in IP protection.
9. Ethics in AI IP
AI companies face a tough balancing act: protecting their IP while staying ethical. It's not just about following rules—it's about doing what's right.
Adding Ethical Guidelines
Smart AI companies are baking ethics into their IP strategies. Here's how:
- Self-check first
Companies need to look hard at their AI before filing patents. Is it fair? Transparent? Safe?
IBM's AI Fairness 360 toolkit helps spot bias in AI models. It's open-source, showing IBM's commitment to ethical AI.
- Clear use rules
When patenting AI tech, set strict guidelines on how it can (and can't) be used.
Google's AI Principles state they won't pursue AI that could cause harm. It's a clear ethical stand.
- Think beyond profits
AI patents should aim to help society, not just make money.
The EU's proposed AI Act pushes for explainable AI. Users should know why AI makes certain choices.
- Keep humans in the loop
AI shouldn't make big decisions alone. Human oversight is key.
AI Decision Area | Human Role |
---|---|
Data Selection | Check for bias |
Model Training | Set ethical boundaries |
Output Review | Verify fairness |
- Stay updated
AI moves fast. Ethical guidelines need regular updates.
PwC predicts AI will add $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030. With big impact comes big responsibility.
Ethical AI isn't just nice to have—it's a must. Companies that ignore ethics risk backlash, fines, and lost trust.
"AI is probably the most important thing humanity has ever worked on. I think of it as something more profound than electricity or fire." - Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google
The message? With great AI power comes great ethical responsibility.
10. Keeping Up with AI Progress
AI moves fast. IP laws? Not so much. This gap creates problems for AI companies trying to protect their work.
Flexible IP Rules
We need rules that can change as fast as AI does. Here's what's happening:
1. Current laws fall short
In March 2023, the U.S. Copyright Office made it clear: only humans can get copyright. This leaves AI-created work in a legal gray area.
2. Real-world impacts
Take Kristina Kashtanova's "Zarya of the Dawn". The Copyright Office took back its protection when they found out AI was involved.
3. Global efforts
Countries are trying to catch up:
Country | Action |
---|---|
UK | AI added £3.7bn to economy last year |
EU | Proposed AI Act in 2021 |
Australia | IP Australia looking into AI's impact |
4. New ideas needed
Some suggest creating a new type of IP right just for AI work. It's called "Digiwork". The AI owner would hold the rights, with AI listed as the "source".
5. Balancing act
The trick is protecting human creators while letting AI innovation thrive.
"If left unchanged, it is more likely than not that the current IP regime will favor a dramatic shift away from human-led creation and towards one where more and more works are generated by machines." - Arun Sundararajan, NYU Stern Professor
6. What companies can do
- Check your IP: Look for unprotected value and risks.
- Get clear proof of ownership for all work.
- Talk to IP experts about what to patent.
- Be honest about AI use in copyright applications.
The bottom line? AI companies need to stay alert. Laws are changing. Those who plan ahead will win.
Conclusion
The AI industry faces a tricky IP situation in 2024. Laws can't keep up with how fast AI is growing, making it hard to protect AI-created stuff.
Here's what's going on:
- The U.S. Copyright Office says only humans can own copyrights. So what happens to AI-made work?
- Companies need to be super careful about how they use data to avoid getting in trouble.
- It's not clear if AI algorithms can be patented. Patent offices need to figure this out.
- We need countries to work together to protect IP rights everywhere.
What should AI companies do?
1. Check their IP regularly
2. Keep good records of how they make AI
3. Have clear rules for using AI
4. Stay up-to-date on IP laws
Do This | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Check IP | Find risks and valuable stuff |
Keep records | Prove you own your work |
Set AI rules | Follow laws and avoid problems |
Watch laws | Be ready for changes |
"Without a strong patent system, you won't have the innovation and invention that you need to have." - Kathy, Undersecretary of Commerce and Director of the United States Patent Trademark Office
We need to protect human creators AND help AI grow. Companies that handle their IP well and roll with the legal punches will come out on top in this wild AI world.