Why Bad Drafting Can't Be Solved by Technology Alone

Ken Adams, a renowned expert in contract drafting, recently shared his thoughts on the limitations of technology in solving the problem of bad drafting. In his article, he argues that while technology can certainly help streamline the drafting process, it cannot replace the human touch and expertise required to produce high-quality contracts.

Adams points out that technology can only go so far in terms of automating the drafting process. While it can help with tasks such as formatting and grammar checking, it cannot replace the human judgment and creativity required to draft a contract that is clear, concise, and effective.

He also highlights the importance of human review and editing in the drafting process. Even with the help of technology, a contract still needs to be reviewed and edited by a human to ensure that it is accurate, complete, and free of errors.

Adams' article serves as a reminder that while technology can be a valuable tool in the drafting process, it is not a substitute for human expertise and judgment. To produce high-quality contracts, it is essential to combine the best of both worlds - technology and human expertise.

Read the full article to learn more about Ken Adams' thoughts on the limitations of technology in contract drafting.